Parents vs School Boards

Parents Are Not a Threat Mr. Agent Man

This is!!!!! Antifa and Black Lives Matters activists. Photo courtesy of en-volv.com

After the death of George Floyd, cities across the country went up in flames by the hands of BLM and Antifa activists.

Businesses were burnt to the ground, police officers were routinely assaulted, federal, and private property were defaced, and citizens lived in constant fear.

This went on for months while Democrats were claiming these were “peaceful protests,” and the Federal Bureau of Investigations concluded they did not have evidence showing Antifa was a domestic terrorist group.

Of course, for a person like me who has been trained in counter terrorism and worked for 15 years preventing terrorists from conducting another 9/11 style attack, this laughable.

Now the Department of Justice wants to designate concerned parents as “domestic terrorists.”  Just because these parents do not want their children to be forced fed Critical Race Theory garbage which is designed to divide our country.

I wrote about this a few days ago, but since then new details have come out about AG Garland and his relationship with promoters of Critical Race Theory.

It is interesting, AG Garland’s son-in-law, Alexander Tanner, is president of Panorama Education, a company who makes millions from the government education system by promoting and selling Critical Race Theory surveys and Critical Race Theory curriculums to government schools across the country. Can you say conflict of interest? YES, BECAUSE IT IS!!!

No wonder AG Garland wants to use the power of the federal government to protect his son-in-law’s bottom line. We saw the same thing during the Obama years with the Internal Revenue Service going after conservative groups like the Tea Party Patriots.

Using the FBI to go after parents who are only exercising their first amendment rights, and their rights as parents, is wrong and a waste of investigative resources. Furthermore, that’s Banana Republic law enforcement.

But how real is this threat by the Department of Justice? According to former SEAL, FBI agent, and fellow former Federal Air Marshal, Jonathan Gilliam, sources at the FBI have told him they have not seen any written directives. He shared this information during an interview with Breitbart News and went on to say he believed this was a bluff.

Personally, I do not believe it’s a bluff, but at the same time I would like to think the FBI would stay away from something that has nothing to do with real terrorism. If they want to deal with real terrorists, I could think about our porous borders and groups like BLM and Antifa.

BLM and Antifa may not be as active as they were during the Trump presidency, but they are still there, and they remain a threat to this country. There is nothing peaceful about burning buildings or setting police stations on fire.

Lastly, the hypocrisy of the left never ceases to amaze me. Just this week, “climate change” protesters clashed with law enforcement at the Department of the Interior in Washington, D.C.

The Department of Interior released a statement, not condemning the violence but saying the Department “believes strongly in respecting and upholding the right to free speech and peaceful protest.”

Say what? There was nothing peaceful about it. These protesters were trying to break into the building while fighting and disobeying law enforcement. By liberal standards, this was an act of insurrection.

But wait a minute, these were Joe Biden voters, so it is all right to commit acts of insurrection under the cover of “free speech.”

Just as the events of January 6th were quite different from an act of insurrection, the protests at the Department of the Interior were nothing more than a bunch of greenies complaining about lack of action from the administration. Nevertheless, they were not peaceful, and they should have been managed accordingly.

This is an example on how if you think like a liberal you can get caught up in a labyrinth of worthless slogans, labels, and accusations. Violence should be never justified, regardless of party affiliation.

The government, be federal or state, do not have the right to tell parents how to raise their children or what’s appropriate education. We are entitled to question, respectfully, our school board officials, after all, we all pay taxes to fund these schools, and we have the right to know how that money is used.

Instead of chasing concerned parents, I would like to suggest the FBI concentrate their efforts on real crimes and real terrorism. This is something I expect from Banana Republic security apparatuses, not the United States of America.

Can’t Afford Them? Don’t Have Them

Joe Biden Socialized Childcare Agenda

Can’t afford them? That’s a “you” problem, not a government problem. Photo courtesy of westlondon.com

Joe Biden continues to promote his socialist agenda every chance he gets and every time he can get a few people in a room to listen.

While visiting Connecticut, he took the opportunity to promote his taxpayer funded childcare program. He thinks that by giving free childcare to parents, these parents will be able to go to work and make a living. Sure Joe!

He is trying to use this as leverage for his $3.5 trillion spending package, the one his own party will not go along with because it will bankrupt a country in already financial stress.

As usual, he uses empty words and gibberish. He says free childcare is necessary in “keeping America competitive in the global economy.” 

Really? You must be a producer to be competitive and a viable trading partner, and we are not. Biden killed one of the only industries that was making money while making us energy independent, the oil industry.

He claims parents cannot be part of the workforce because they cannot afford the price of childcare. Seriously? If you have job, you can pay for your own childcare. First, you must look for a job. Mooching unemployment checks is not a job, you are a burden to society.

According to One America News Network, Biden was asking for $200 billion in funding as part of the “Care Economy Policy.”  Now, he is pushing for private businesses to build “on-site” childcare centers.

Who is going to pay for this? Are private business owners on the hook for this additional expense? Is Biden going to use this to strip non-compliant business owners of their businesses? This is nothing more than Banana Republic socialism.

Private businesses can barely stay afloat with all the new bloated COVID-19 regulations and know the government wants them to become de facto babysitters.

Biden went on to say, “So, if you go to work with your child and you have a serious facility on-site. Well, studies show that when you have on-site care for children, businesses, the business itself have less employee turnover, less absenteeism, and higher productivity. We can show you all those studies. It’s real.”

Folks, Biden cannot produce those studies because they do not exist. This is all socialist leftwing propaganda. If this were indeed true, the Federal government would have already implemented such a program government wide.

Bottom line, taxpayers are not responsible for your children’s childcare. If you cannot afford childcare, it means you cannot afford to have children.

The government, be Federal or State, is not responsible for your irresponsible decisions.

The Biden Administration vs The Constitution

The Fight Over the Debt Ceiling and the 14th Amendment

Enough said! Photo courtesy of thefederalistpapers.org

The Biden Administration on their never-ending quest to bankrupt the United States with reckless spending, bottomless budgets, uncontrolled illegal immigration, and unlimited unfunded liabilities, is trying to revoke the Constitution on their own.

Specifically, the Biden administration is trying to use Section 4 of the 14th amendment, to justify eliminating the debt ceiling all together.

Section 4 of the 14th amendment reads as follow:

Section 4.

“The validity of the public debt of the United States, authorized by law, including debts incurred for payment of pensions and bounties for services in suppressing insurrection or rebellion, shall not be questioned. But neither the United States nor any state shall assume or pay any debt or obligation incurred in aid of insurrection or rebellion against the United States, or any claim for the loss or emancipation of any slave; but all such debts, obligations and claims shall be held illegal and void.”

This would be completely unconstitutional as is the responsibility of the United States Congress to pay the bills via appropriations legislation, and only the Congress has the power to enforce Section 4, as specified on Section 5 of the 14th amendment.

Section 5.

“The Congress shall have power to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions of this article.”

Any attempt by the White House would be a clear usurpation of the Separation of Powers. The White House does not have the authority to unilaterally amend the United States Constitution or appropriate funds to serve its purpose.

As the Secretary of the Treasury, Janet Yellen, stated in a recent interview, “the White House interfering in matters of debt would be a disastrous situation.” 

As a mentioned before, the debt ceiling was established to control government spending, not as an open-ended credit card for wasteful spending.

The deadline to raise the debt ceiling, again, is fast approaching and lawmakers need to produce something by December 3rd.

Senate Minority Leader, Mitch McConnell told President Biden not to count on Republicans to help in another debt ceiling bailout, but Democrats know how McConnell operates and they can smell his bluff a mile away.

It is funny to see the Democrats invoking the Constitution when it serves their nefarious purposes. Otherwise, our Constitutional rights mean nothing to these people and the Constitution is an antiquated document.

Joke of the Week

Biden Administration Blames COVID-19 for Lousy Jobs Report

Stand up comedian, Jen Psaki, delivering the joke. Photo courtesy of therightscoop.com

I understand the Biden Administration has made a habit of blaming everyone else for their screw ups but blaming COVID-19 for the latest jobs report is laughable and ridiculous.

On Friday, October 8th press briefing, the current White House Press Secretary, and failed former State Department Press Secretary under the Obama administration, Jen Psaki, told reporters, “We’ve also seen that the pandemic, while it’s been incredibly challenging on many many levels, it’s also prompted many people to think what their careers might look like and what careers they may pursue,” 

She went on to say, “In our assessment, one is people are still fearful of COVID and what it will be like in work places and ensuring their own safety. There are still challenges as it relates to childcare, eldercare, the cost of those and being able to afford it, and also the availability which is something we’ve seen a shortage of in many communities.”

Psaki moved on by saying Biden was leading during a hard time.

First off, the Biden administration created these “hard times” by themselves and then shifted the burden on to the American people. Our economy was in a good place and jobs were plenty before the Biden administration took office.

One does not have to be a genius to understand the low jobs report numbers come in part because of government paying people more money to stay at home, federal government overreach on private businesses, and COVID-19 unconstitutional mandates.

This is a stagnant economy and therefore 194,000 is not an unexpected number. Of course, when economists are expecting 500,000, this is exposing the failure of the Biden administration.

Democrats need to stop blaming a virus and start taking responsibility for the failed economic policies and the government created welfare state for keeping people away from the job market.

Why work when the government is redistributing from the doers to give to the takers? Exactly!

I am sure laughing…